[D-runtime] Chaining Errors

Don Clugston dclugston at googlemail.com
Sat Jan 22 07:53:27 PST 2011

No reason that I know of. I think you should add Throwable to all of them.

On 22 January 2011 12:17, Jonathan M Davis <jmdavisProg at gmx.com> wrote:
> Throwable is chainable. Exception is chainable. Error is chainable. They all
> take an option Throwable argument in at least one of their constructors.
> Typically, all classes derived from Exception do the same. However, for some
> reason, none of the classes in core.exception which are derived from Error take
> a Throwable argument. Is there a particular reason for this? I'm inclined to add
> a default null Throwable to their constructors just like pretty much every other
> Throwable has. But I figured that I should enquire as to whether there was a good
> reason that I can't think of why none of the Error classes in core.exception
> take an optional Throwable.
> - Jonathan M Davis
> _______________________________________________
> D-runtime mailing list
> D-runtime at puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/d-runtime

More information about the D-runtime mailing list