[D-runtime] What's with core.sync.condition usage?

[Sean Kelly]

On Apr 26, 2012, at 7:50 AM, Steve Schveighoffer wrote:
> 
> Now, I'm all for a use case of storing the mutex in the condition and having the condition "own" the mutex, but that should not be a limitation, you should be able to attach multiple conditions to the same mutex, which means none of them own it.

I remember you saying that Condition should have a mutex() property, and then I forgot to add it.  I think I'll take care of that today.