To POD or not to POD

[David Nadlinger]

On Tuesday, 12 February 2013 at 17:45:11 UTC, Johannes Pfau wrote:
> OT: I think a simple constructor shouldn't prevent a type from 
> being a
> POD, but that should be defined by dmd /frontend.

I wouldn't spend too much time on implementing the old behavior - 
I think I managed to convince Walter that constructors preventing 
PODness is a bad idea in the last bigger discussion on the topic. 
He also mentioned what sounded like plans in this regard in a 
recent pull request.

Instead, I'd just comment out that specific check in isPOD.

David