D.2.062 merge

eles eles at eles.com
Wed Feb 20 00:05:15 PST 2013


On Tuesday, 19 February 2013 at 11:33:59 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
> On 18 February 2013 08:16, Iain Buclaw <ibuclaw at ubuntu.com> 
> wrote:
>   I have it in the works to replace these areas in
> gdc (see thread on removing toobj, typinf, and todt) - but it 
> looks like
> things will be worse before they start improving again on this 
> instance.

Won't be better to merge rather smaller increments? For example,
merging one commit (from dmd) at a time?

That way, the gdc will follow the dmd commit by commit, and not
only release by release. I hope this would bring easier merging,
as less code changes are required.

What do you think?


More information about the D.gnu mailing list