d bare bones

[Dicebot]

On Friday, 6 September 2013 at 12:25:56 UTC, eles wrote:
> On Friday, 6 September 2013 at 10:43:38 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
>> On 6 September 2013 10:35, eles <eles at eles.com> wrote:
>>  But there's no equivalent to volatile statements other than
>> implementing your own low level thread library for use in 
>> kernel-land
>> to allow synchronized to work properly.
>
> Frankly, but each day D becomes better, it becomes worse for 
> systems programming. I'll have more&more difficulties to defend 
> it as an acceptable solution at my workplace.
>
> I am sorry about that, but I cannot do much about it... :(

Yes, I feel quite the same way and I have almost abandoned any 
hopes to use it in C domain. Currently D is more like native 
faster C# - still pretty cool in lot of applications but 
definitely not the breakthrough.