Overhaul filename convention

[Iain Buclaw]

On 26 February 2014 11:48, Daniel Murphy <yebbliesnospam at gmail.com> wrote:
> "Iain Buclaw"  wrote in message
> news:mailman.306.1393348468.6445.d.gnu at puremagic.com...
>
>> > And give them better names while you're at it?
>>
>> Visitor names?  I was thinking IRVisitor, and build_ir ().  ;)
>
>
> I mean, you have todt.c with all the toDt methods, which you are now free to
> call something meaningful to gcc.

That's d-todt.cc - But yes, that is the plan.  Not that anything we
name needs to be meaningful to gcc.