master branch broken

Brad Roberts braddr at puremagic.com
Mon Mar 31 12:58:26 PDT 2014


On 3/31/14, 10:06 AM, Iain Buclaw wrote:
> On 24 March 2014 07:34, Iain Buclaw <ibuclaw at gdcproject.org> wrote:
>> On 23 March 2014 19:28, Iain Buclaw <ibuclaw at gdcproject.org> wrote:
>>> On 23 March 2014 09:31, Johannes Pfau <nospam at example.com> wrote:
>>>> Am Sat, 22 Mar 2014 14:50:22 -0700
>>>> schrieb Brad Roberts <braddr at puremagic.com>:
>>>>
>>>>> On 3/22/14, 12:02 PM, Iain Buclaw wrote:
>>>>>> On 22 March 2014 18:20, Johannes Pfau <nospam at example.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> See
>>>>>>> https://d.puremagic.com/test-results/test_data.ghtml?projectid=2&runid=62582&logid=13
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> (Didn't see this in my local tests, it probably needs a complete
>>>>>>> gdc rebuild to happen)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hmm, didn't see that either.
>>>>>
>>>>> Has the minimum base gcc version moved forward again?
>>>>
>>>> I don't think that's the case here, at least there's no obvious change
>>>> that could require a newer snapshot.
>>>>
>>>
>>> In this case, it's a GCC GC bug.
>>>
>>> Fix incoming.
>>
>> Still failing with a second unrelated issue.  Looks like wrong code
>> sent to back-end  (trying to compile an ERROR_MARK) - I probably
>> exposed a couple wrong handling of errors in the backend through some
>> refactoring.   What I might end up doing is submitting a new visitor
>> to walk all trees and assert if an error expression is found, that at
>> least safe guards me from having to put in workarounds to handle junk
>> codegen.  :-)
>
> Green again.  I've also bumped the snapshot version to 20140330. :)
>
> http://d.puremagic.com/test-results/?projectid=2

Good for the green.  I'll add support for paying attention to that version file soonish.. but 
probably not today.



More information about the D.gnu mailing list