[Bug 205] Add pragma(inline) to the grammar

[via D.gnu]

http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=205

--- Comment #9 from Iain Buclaw <ibuclaw at gdcproject.org> ---
(In reply to thomas.bockman from comment #8)
> > Well, I can make it a candidate for 2.067
> 
> That would be appreciated.
> 
> Don't bother if it looks like it will be too much work though; I only filed
> this because I figured that just adding it to the grammar would be quick and
> easy since it doesn't need to actually *do* anything.
> 
> Either way, you're going to support pragma(inline, ...) for real in 2.068,
> right?

Yes, though there is a matter of getting cross-module inlining to work first
before I can say that "proper" support should be added.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/d.gnu/attachments/20160131/bff2cbba/attachment-0001.html>