Testing GDC (GCC 7.1) on Runtime-less ARM Cortex-M

[Mike via D.gnu]

On Sunday, 25 June 2017 at 10:53:35 UTC, Mike wrote:

> I'm not really interested in that because its too blunt of an 
> instrument.  I'd like to use TypeInfo, but only if I'm doing 
> dynamic casts or other things that require such runtime 
> information.  Also, I'd only want the TypeInfo for the types 
> that need it in my binary.  I've said this before but I'll 
> repeat:  I like TypeInfo; I just don't like dead code.

Just a little more information about this.  It doesn't appear 
that the entire TypeInfo object is remaining in the binary.  It 
appears to only be the `name` of the type that the linker just 
can't seem to "garbage collection" from the .rodata section.

Mike