<html>
<head>
<base href="http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/" />
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - Build script and infrastructure to produce and release Windows binaries."
href="http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=116#c4">Comment # 4</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - Build script and infrastructure to produce and release Windows binaries."
href="http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=116">bug 116</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:bruno.do.medeiros+gdcbugz@gmail.com" title="Bruno Medeiros <bruno.do.medeiros+gdcbugz@gmail.com>"> <span class="fn">Bruno Medeiros</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to Iain Buclaw from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=116#c3">comment #3</a>)
<span class="quote">> Those patches aren't essential. The recent mingw builds are evident of that.
> However I am aware of some essential runtime fixes in those patches (some
> TLS related) but almost all are unsuitable for inclusion.</span >
Ian, I didn't understand your point, it seems self contradictory. You say the
patches aren't essential, and yet at the same time that there are "some
essential runtime fixes in those patches" ?..</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are watching all bug changes.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>