<html>
<head>
<base href="http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/" />
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - Add support for attribute to mark data as volatile."
href="http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=126#c6">Comment # 6</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - Add support for attribute to mark data as volatile."
href="http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=126">bug 126</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:ibuclaw@gdcproject.org" title="Iain Buclaw <ibuclaw@gdcproject.org>"> <span class="fn">Iain Buclaw</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to Johannes Pfau from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=126#c5">comment #5</a>)
<span class="quote">> Oh, and back to topic:
>
> > I am quite open to solutions, other than I don't think 'volatile' as a keyword > would be something reintroduced to the language am afaid.
>
> Yes, that's what I fear as well. But thinking about it volatility is a
> property of the memory location and that best maps to a type qualifier.
> (It's not exactly the same thing, but we also have this conflation for
> immutable type / read only memory and in practice it should work fine).
> </span >
If we are going for property, maybe @volatile might end up standing. ;)</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are watching all bug changes.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>