<html>
<head>
<base href="http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/" />
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - gcc/d/dfrontend/outbuffer.c needs alloca.h on Solarish systems"
href="http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=134#c3">Comment # 3</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - gcc/d/dfrontend/outbuffer.c needs alloca.h on Solarish systems"
href="http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=134">bug 134</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:ibuclaw@gdcproject.org" title="Iain Buclaw <ibuclaw@gdcproject.org>"> <span class="fn">Iain Buclaw</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to Jason King from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=134#c2">comment #2</a>)
<span class="quote">> Done -- note the fix corresponds to patching gcc/d/dfrontend/port.h
>
> Looking at gcc/d/dfrontend/port.h, it explicitly includes stdlib.h to get
> alloca(), so it seems like the check and include should be there.</span >
My concern is that because upstream differs, this will be overwritten in a
month, and having it in the header may mask any other places where it is
needed.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are watching all bug changes.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>