<html>
<head>
<base href="http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/">
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - Add pragma(inline) to the grammar"
href="http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=205#c9">Comment # 9</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - Add pragma(inline) to the grammar"
href="http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=205">bug 205</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:ibuclaw@gdcproject.org" title="Iain Buclaw <ibuclaw@gdcproject.org>"> <span class="fn">Iain Buclaw</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to thomas.bockman from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=205#c8">comment #8</a>)
<span class="quote">> > Well, I can make it a candidate for 2.067
>
> That would be appreciated.
>
> Don't bother if it looks like it will be too much work though; I only filed
> this because I figured that just adding it to the grammar would be quick and
> easy since it doesn't need to actually *do* anything.
>
> Either way, you're going to support pragma(inline, ...) for real in 2.068,
> right?</span >
Yes, though there is a matter of getting cross-module inlining to work first
before I can say that "proper" support should be added.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are watching all bug changes.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>