DMD 0.165 release

[Walter Bright]

Sean Kelly wrote:
> Thanks.  I suppose it's worth mentioning that lazy evaluation can result 
> in some confusing errors similar to those encountered with macro 
> functions vs. normal functions.  For example:
> 
>     void fn( char delegate() ch )
>     {
>         if( ch() == 'c' || ch() == 'd' )
>         {
>             printf( "match\n" );
>         }
>     }
> 
>     size_t pos = 0;
>     char[] buf = "abdc";
> 
>     fn( buf[++pos] );
> 
> The above code would print "match" because pos would be incremented 
> twice.  This makes API changes from the classic to lambda syntax a risky 
> venture, as it risks silently breaking once-working code.

It doesn't break existing once-working code, because the example shown 
will not compile with 0.164 and earlier compilers.