DMD 0.165 release

[Derek Parnell]

On Mon, 21 Aug 2006 12:47:01 -0700, Walter Bright wrote:

> Frank Benoit wrote:
>>> It doesn't break existing once-working code, because the example shown
>>> will not compile with 0.164 and earlier compilers.
>> 
>> It does if you had before both:
>> void fn( char delegate() ch ){...}
>> void fn( char ch ){...}
>> 
>> is now ambiguous for the call, so the only option is to remove the
>> second proto.
> 
> That's right.

And yet so wrong too.

-- 
Derek Parnell
Melbourne, Australia
"Down with mediocrity!"