DMD 0.165 release

[Walter Bright]

Derek Parnell wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Aug 2006 11:06:12 -0700, Walter Bright wrote:
> 
>> BCS wrote:
>>> given
>>>
>>> void foo(char[]);
>>> void foo(char[] delegate());
>>>
>>> how do I force the use of  the first?
>> You can't. Think of it like:
>>
>> void foo(in int x);
>> void foo(out int y);
>> void foo(inout int z);
>>
>> Can't force the use of one of those, either.
> 
> But why is that *not* a problem with the language?

A good question. I think the answer is that one would be want to 
overload based on in/out/inout only to write obfuscated code.