DMD 0.165 release

[BCS]

Walter Bright wrote:
> Derek Parnell wrote:
> 
>> On Mon, 21 Aug 2006 11:06:12 -0700, Walter Bright wrote:
>>
>>> BCS wrote:
>>>
>>>> given
>>>>
>>>> void foo(char[]);
>>>> void foo(char[] delegate());
>>>>
>>>> how do I force the use of  the first?
>>>
>>> You can't. Think of it like:
>>>
>>> void foo(in int x);
>>> void foo(out int y);
>>> void foo(inout int z);
>>>
>>> Can't force the use of one of those, either.
>>
>>
>> But why is that *not* a problem with the language?
> 
> 
> A good question. I think the answer is that one would be want to 
> overload based on in/out/inout only to write obfuscated code.

but the lazy vs. non-lazy question isn't so simple


log(RunSQLStuff());

vs.

log("This is a string");


???