refined sugar (was DMD 0.165 release)

[Russ Lewis]

kris wrote:
> # somefunk ({++i});

I'm a big fan of this syntax, since we (or, at least, I) already 
associate {} with "block of code".

I'm very excited about this development (even without any explicit 
syntax) but I, too, worry about ambiguities.  My gut says that if we 
don't make this explicit, we're going to be bitten by it later, when 
somebody stumbles upon some strange circumstance where the situation is 
truly *ambiguous*, or -worse yet- the code does something different than 
what would seem to be the obvious thing.  We don't have the example 
yet...but if we omit the explicit syntax, then it's going to be hard to 
fix when we find those examples.