DMD 0.148 release

[bobef]

Derek Parnell wrote:

> In other words, is the 'bool' a 
> mistake and really meant 'int'? Because the use of 1 in this way is 
> ambiguous it ought to be made cleaner / clearer to future maintainers.

I think this is the case. In programming when one says bool, he actually 
means int... So I believe making it real bool is something we don't 
need, because it works just fine this way. What we have to do (maybe, I 
don't need it personally) is to think of new name for a type which is 
true relative to non zero and false relative to zero... Then it will 
work with the current state of programming languages and will not 
conflict with the name bool. Although in computers many words are uses 
with different meaning... I don't know... I lost the original thought 
already...