Ivan Senji wrote: > Georg Wrede wrote: > That is one part I didn't understand. Why would booleans have to be 0 or > 1? (or are you kidding, I'm too tired to be sure). Since anything stored on a computer is representable with numbers, then we could of course have true be 27 and false be 41. But is there any profit in it, compared to 0 and 1?