my opinion on secrecy of D license
Georg Wrede
georg.wrede at nospam.org
Thu Jun 1 15:07:21 PDT 2006
Dejan Lekic wrote:
> Well, you might think it is wrong - i certainly do not. dmd\license.txt
> and dmd\src\phobos\phoboslicense.txt files in DMD package tell
> everything people shold know, in plain english.
The problem is just that not everybody does find, download and unzip the
DMD package, and then seek the files you mentioned. (I'm an old one
here, but I'm not talking about myself, rather the thousands of new-to-D
people who come and go.) A lot of people want to know the licensing
issues up front, before wasting their time downloading stuff.
So, first, the license stuff has to be so prominent that folks see it
before having to search for it.
And second, it has to be written "in plain language". (There can then of
course be a pointer to the Real Legalese, or to those two files you
mentioned, but the prominently visible text itself just has to be
understandable right off the bat.)
More information about the Digitalmars-d-announce
mailing list