dparser 0.148 something concrete attn: Ben Hinkle

pragma pragma_member at pathlink.com
Fri Mar 3 10:04:14 PST 2006


In article <du9p97$6rf$1 at digitaldaemon.com>, AgentOrange says...
>
>
>I agree, its pretty raw still and mostly unusable unless you know the dmd front
>end. I added those symbollistings from poseidon just for the heck of it. But my
>main goal up till now was to get the parser up to date with the current
>compiler. Ive been kind of afraid to touch it until I had it updated because of
>the way ive managed converting the code. But Ive done some extensive testing
>lately with parsing then generating code and verifying binaries are identicle,
>which has been successfull. Yes I have completely avoided ddoc until this point,
>but my next goal is to get ddoc.c converted to D and then I will work out an
>interface for dparser. Yeah there has been some discussions around #D about docs
>and someone even mentioned going back to doxygen (shudder), so I figure a ddoc
>implementation we can get our hands dirty with can be pretty usefull......

Awesome.  I'm glad to hear that you're heavily into hacking this thing (amoung
other things).  DMD's doc generation is adequate for basic stuff, but I really
want to get first-class documentation going.  Its time to swim in the deep end
of the pool, and this looks like the fastest way to get there.

- EricAnderton at yahoo



More information about the Digitalmars-d-announce mailing list