DMD 0.149 release

[Lucas Goss]

Jarrett Billingsley wrote:
> "Lucas Goss" <lgoss007 at gmail.com> wrote in message 
> news:dun5ej$2vej$1 at digitaldaemon.com...
>> The inconsistency is in the style of the language. Where else in the 
>> language is there a keyword inside another keyword? Yes I know exit, 
>> success, and failure aren't necessarily keywords, but they are within the 
>> context of scope() (or scope of scope, :) ).
> 
> extern(C)
> 
> pragma(msg, "hi") 

I knew there was some I wasn't thinking of. And version(name) too.

Thinking about it, does that mean this can be done?:
scope(exit) {
    class1.cleanup();
    class2.cleanup();
}

I think of it more like an event accumulator stack, not really a 
statement, so this just seems strange:
scope(exit) class1.cleanup();
scope(exit) class2.cleanup();

Maybe because I don't do anything like:
if(thisIsTrue) okToExecute();