std.date proposal

Frank Benoit frank at nix.de
Wed Mar 29 13:00:31 PST 2006


Timestamp is double.
I don't think a date dependent precision is good choice.
I vote for

/**
 Nanosecondes since 1/1/2000
 */
public typedef long d_timestamp;

This is enough for +-270 Years and has an accuracy which is good enough
for me :)

Frank



More information about the Digitalmars-d-announce mailing list