D 1.0 for Jan 1, 2007

[Charles D Hixson]

Lars Ivar Igesund wrote:
> BLS wrote:
> 
>> Lars Ivar Igesund schrieb:
>>...
>> Kind regards Björn
> 
> Yes, but there Java 1.2 is a stable specification. What I am trying to say,
> is that D 1.0 needs to be set enough in stone, so that the document/webpage
> on it don't change on the first new release of DMD. I personally don't
> think "Just use the compiler tagged 1.0, and you have a stable
> environment." is good enough, because we _will_ want bugfixes, and we
> _will_ want to use new (or test) features when they appear (or when they
> have proved themselves), without ruining the application we spent hours and
> hours on to get working with D 1.0.
> 
1.0.xxx for the stable tree and 1.1.xxx for the experimental tree?