A new debugger for Linux - would it work for D?

[Frits van Bommel]

Bruno Medeiros wrote:
> As for fixes, how about just mangling the inner function with a full D 
> name mangling, treating the parent names as if they were D-mangled too?:
> _D4modl4funcFZv5innerFZv
> This way we (maybe) can't tell the calling convention of the parent 
> functions... but does that matter?

It might matter for something like DDL if it wants to call a function in 
a dynamically-loaded module. It's kind of important to know the calling 
convention for that :). (Not sure if DDL currently does anything like 
this, but if not it might in the future)