Is DMD 0.166 RC 1.0?

[BLS]

Hi Kyle,
Sorry about my ignorance. Not sure to whom your reply belongs. If it is me :
The answere is :Not at all ! What about . DWT, DTL, some not yet written
native libs, and of
course the Java to D stuff.
IMO Lib.-Development requires a lot of time. So wether Walter named 166
1.0 including a feature freeze, or  he decided to implement requested
features until 1.0, again feature freezed.

Bjoern

"Kyle Furlong" <kylefurlong at gmail.com> schreef in bericht
news:edea7q$2858$1 at digitaldaemon.com...
> BLS wrote:
> > Hi Walter,
> > I think your question  should be dedicated to the library developers,
> > because :
> > D needs more stable libraries.
> > Library development needs a feature freeze so ask them what is needed to
> > create well designed long living libs. Implement it and name it 1.0.
> >
> > Bjoern
> >
> >
> > "Walter Bright" <newshound at digitalmars.com> schreef in bericht
> > news:edctpl$12jt$1 at digitaldaemon.com...
> >> Any compelling reason why not? I know that everyone (including me)
wants
> >> more features, more improvements, etc., but nothing about calling it
1.0
> >> will prevent that from happening.
> >
> >
>
> /signed as a proposal
>
> Kris? Sean?
>
> -- 
> Kyle Furlong // Physics Undergrad, UCSB
>
> "D is going wherever the D community wants it to go." - Walter Bright