Is DMD 0.166 RC 1.0?

[Kyle Furlong]

BLS wrote:
> Hi Kyle,
> Sorry about my ignorance. Not sure to whom your reply belongs. If it is me :
> The answere is :Not at all ! What about . DWT, DTL, some not yet written
> native libs, and of
> course the Java to D stuff.
> IMO Lib.-Development requires a lot of time. So wether Walter named 166
> 1.0 including a feature freeze, or  he decided to implement requested
> features until 1.0, again feature freezed.
> 
> Bjoern
> 
> "Kyle Furlong" <kylefurlong at gmail.com> schreef in bericht
> news:edea7q$2858$1 at digitaldaemon.com...
>> BLS wrote:
>>> Hi Walter,
>>> I think your question  should be dedicated to the library developers,
>>> because :
>>> D needs more stable libraries.
>>> Library development needs a feature freeze so ask them what is needed to
>>> create well designed long living libs. Implement it and name it 1.0.
>>>
>>> Bjoern
>>>
>>>
>>> "Walter Bright" <newshound at digitalmars.com> schreef in bericht
>>> news:edctpl$12jt$1 at digitaldaemon.com...
>>>> Any compelling reason why not? I know that everyone (including me)
> wants
>>>> more features, more improvements, etc., but nothing about calling it
> 1.0
>>>> will prevent that from happening.
>>>
>> /signed as a proposal
>>
>> Kris? Sean?
>>
>> -- 
>> Kyle Furlong // Physics Undergrad, UCSB
>>
>> "D is going wherever the D community wants it to go." - Walter Bright
> 
> 

I mentioned Kris and Sean since they have some of the most extensive, 
public, and mature library code in the D community, of course, this 
doesnt marginalize the voice of other library writers.

-- 
Kyle Furlong // Physics Undergrad, UCSB

"D is going wherever the D community wants it to go." - Walter Bright