Is DMD 0.166 RC 1.0?

[Ivan Senji]

xs0 wrote:
> Ivan Senji wrote:
>> xs0 wrote:
>>> Would you care for any language that (regardless of other features) 
>>> made you type "return a+b" like this:
>>>
>>> accumulator foo;
>>> foo.add(a);
>>> foo.add(b);
>>> return foo.result;
>>>
>>> Now, consider the remarkable similarity between that case and "auto 
>>> foo = new int[3][4][5]" versus
>>
>> Actually this works. But foo cannot be initialized with an initializer.
> 
> OK, that particular statement might work, but it doesn't do what you 
> expect:
> 
> int[][][] foo = new int[3][4][5];
> 
> results in
> 
> arr.d(4): cannot implicitly convert expression (new int[3][4][](5)) of 
> type int[3][4][] to int[][][]
> 
> and more importantly, this doesn't work:
> 
> int a=3, b=4, c=5;
> auto foo = new int[a][b][c];

Oops, now I remember that it doesn't work. I got my hopes up to soon :)