MYPERDATA

[Dave]

Hmmm... Is the GMail spam filter that good? If so, awesome. I'd never heard of that prior to this.

BTW - Can I use GMail with my favorite 'fat' email client?

Thanks,

- Dave

Anders Bergh wrote:
> I'm on GMail so spam is not an issue for me. Spam bots, I challenge
> you: anders1 at gmail.com.
> 
> On 4/6/07, Georg Wrede <georg at nospam.org> wrote:
>> For several separate reasons, I have decided to publish my contact
>> xxyxxxx information here. (The x's are just to con robots.) I imagine
>> that publishing it thusly will be obvious to all of you, and still
>> unavailable to trivial robots, so here goes:
>>
>> me: Georg Wrede                 // name, or my average signature...
>> write: georg.wrede
>> after the funny a,
>> [possibly several parts here]
>> part 1: iki
>> part 0: fi
>>
>> Can't figure it out? Too bad. Then you're either a robot, or not worthy
>> of reading this NG in the first place.  <smiley of condescending
>> distaste and aggression>
>>
>> ---
>>
>> I challenge you to reply to this with yours.
>>
>> For all of us, saving these would be appropriate, right.
>>
>> ---
>>
>> Ah, and thinking a bit more on this, let's agree on that whenever we
>> unexpectedly mail each other we'll put the magic letters 'DMD' at the
>> beginning of the Subject!
>>
>> "DMD Wow, I loved your last post about arrays of references to indirect
>> addresses of AAs sorted by bovine dung!"
>>
>> This way the post will pass my junk-mail filter, "and that's not all!"
>> It'll get priority treatment when visually browsing through the new 
>> headers.
>>
>> DMD here stands for Digital Mars D language, not for the DMD compiler as
>> opposed to GDC or whatever. (Do I really have to spell this out?)
>>
>> ---
>>
>> At first I had a reasonable heading to this post, but then I got the
>> idea that we'll need to do this every 6 to 12 months anyway, so a stupid
>> but unforgettable heading would be apropriate, so, the first guy after
>> the "6 months" ought to create a new thread with the same heading. (And
>> even forgetting this particular header, simply searching for single-word
>> all-caps headers gets you a long way.)
>>
>>
> 
>