Mmrnmhrm 0.1 released

[BCS]

Ingo Oeser wrote:
Many switch statements used could be separated into module local
> (e.g. static) functions/methods. The code reuse could happen with many
> smaller functions (e.g. each implementing a case) then. But maybe some
> non-gcc compilers used are bad at inlining.
> 
> This is very hard to do with C++ classes, but more easy with D or plain C.
> 
> static retval_t special_case(context_t context, params...)
> {
>         /* handle complex special case with about 10-30 lines */
> }
> 
> retval_t big_red_switch(params...)
> {
>         context_t context;
>         foreach(param in params)
>         {
>                 switch (param)
>                 {
>                 case easy_one:
>                         return foo;
>                 case easy_two:
>                         context.bar = param;
>                         context.boo = xyz;
>                         break;
>                 case hard_one:
>                         context.bar = special_case(context, param, xyz);
>                         break;
>                 case hard_two:
>                         context.bar = special_case(context, param + 3, xizzy);
>                         break;
> 
>                 default:
>                         break;
>                 }
>         }
> }
>

funny I known a guy who, in c#, has taken to writing function as class 
constructors so that he can have "nested" functions. Sounds a lot like 
what you are suggesting.