The D Programming Language by Andrei Alexandrescu

[Charles D Hixson]

Walter Bright wrote:
> Craig Black wrote:
>> Besides, given the scope of D 2.0, I can't quite fathom what features 
>> you would include in a D 3.0.
> 
> It's far too early to make plans, but I expect 3.0 would be a push to 
> support functional programming and other things for multicore programming.
How about a run-time interpretive layer, or a good graphics 
library (not form building, but the kind of thing form 
building libraries are built from)?

Most things I can think of, except run-time interpretation 
(ala Python or Smalltalk), seem to be library improvements.  I 
suppose that a better C++ interface could be invoked here, but 
I see that as a part of 2.x.