DMD 1.019 and 2.003 releases

[0ffh]

BCS wrote:
> Reply to 0ffh,
>> BCS wrote:
>>> Reply to 0ffh,
>>>> [...]
>>> [...]
>> [...]
> Never to my understanding. However this is a good reason to do the more 
> verbose one in that the compiler gets more info and then can use that 
> for optimization (maybe).

Well, if we agree the semantics are identical, then so is the info the
compiler has (phew, I'm glad that this works both ways...).

 > That however is more of a general rule rather than just for this case.

I accept it as a general rule. =)

Kind regards, Frank