preparing for const, final, and invariant

[Walter Bright]

Bruno Medeiros wrote:
> Whoa there, that idea of 'scope' being the default togheter with 'const' 
> and 'final', where did that came from? I understand why (and agree) that 
> 'final' and 'const' should be the default type modifiers for function 
> parameters, but why 'scope' as well?

Because most function parameters are scope already.