x86_64 support please!
Pragma
ericanderton at yahoo.removeme.com
Fri Mar 2 07:40:36 PST 2007
Don Clugston wrote:
> Tomas Lindquist Olsen wrote:
>> Kiriakos Alexoglou wrote:
>>
>>> Please Walter add support for x86_64!
>>>
>>> I use Suse Linux 10.0 and developing in Qt and
>>> I want to try make Qt bindings for dmd.
>>>
>>> The bindings that exist for Qt right now,
>>> can all work with x86_64 architectures.
>>>
>>> In my personal opinion x86_64 support is
>>> more important than adding additional feutures to dmd.
>
> vote--. That may be true, but do you have any idea how much work this
> would involve?? (Hint: begin by implementing a linker from scratch).
> We'd lose Walter for a year! Has to happen someday, but I don't think
> Walter should put any thought into it until GDC-64 is firmly established.
>
> OTOH, I hope we get a working GDC-x64 very soon.
I agree with Don on this one. This is the kind of project that requires a lot of dedicated man-hours to do right. In
other words, it's going to need some serious (fiscal) backing before it'll materialize on anything but a *geologic*
timescale.
Disclaimer: I haven't written anything as involved as a complete compiler toolchain, nor am I a PM. But I'd imagine
that this is the kind of task that doesn't segment easily for sub-teams to handle (aside from the obvious
compiler/linker split). There's just too much vertical integration between parts to have each component developed in
relative isolation from another: parser, parse-tree, semantic analyzer, code generator, .obj generator, optimizer,
linker, etc. So I'm left with the impression that the ideal team size for this may only be a handful of people at best,
lest they begin to interfere with one another, which further compounds the time-to-delivery issue.
--
- EricAnderton at yahoo
More information about the Digitalmars-d-announce
mailing list