Ddbg 0.0.4 alpha release

[Jascha Wetzel]

it does when i try dickl's example.
can you give an example where it doesn't work?

vanh wrote:
> Jascha Wetzel wrote:
>> oh - bug! :) fixed in 0.0.4.1 which i just put on the website.
>> pointers didn't get handled correctly by the expression evaluator and
>> therefore the "this" reference wasn't interpreted correctly.
>> thanks for the report!
>>
>> dickl wrote:
>>> Jascha Wetzel wrote:
>>>> Ddbg is a Win32 D Debugger
>>>>
>>>> http://ddbg.mainia.de/releases.html
>>>>
>>>> This release mainly adds support for type cast and associative arrays.
>>>> Type casts can be used to workaround the missing array and enum support
>>>> in DMD's debug symbols.
>>> dbbg is turning into a great tool !
>>>
>>> I took it from the docs that I should now be able to view contents of
>>> strings. This doesn't seem to be the case, at least for class members.
>>>
>>> Test program
>>> ---------------------
>>> import std.stdio;
>>>
>>> int main(char[][] args)
>>> {
>>>     FOO foo = new FOO;
>>>
>>>     return 0;
>>> }
>>>
>>> class FOO
>>> {
>>>     private char [] str = "Hello";
>>>
>>>     this()
>>>     {
>>>         writefln(str);
>>>     }
>>> }
>>>
>>> Debug results. Note ddbg reports str as null
>>> -------------------
>>>> M:\D-projects\TEST1>ddbg test.exe
>>>> Ddbg v0.0.4 alpha - D Debugger
>>>> Copyright (c) 2007 Jascha Wetzel
>>>> http://ddbg.mainia.de/
>>>>
>>>> ->bp test.d:1
>>>> Breakpoint set: test.d:4 0x402010
>>>> ->r
>>>> ntdll.dll  loaded
>>>> KERNEL32.dll  loaded
>>>> USER32.dll  loaded
>>>> GDI32.dll  loaded
>>>> Breakpoint 0 hit
>>>> test.d:4 0x402010
>>>> int main(char[][] args)
>>>> ->in
>>>> test.d:6 0x402014
>>>>     FOO foo = new FOO;
>>>> ->
>>>> test.d:15 0x402030
>>>>     this()
>>>> ->
>>>> test.d:17 0x402037
>>>>         writefln(str);
>>>> ->lsv
>>>> Scope: MFZC4test3FOO test.FOO._ctor
>>>> class test.FOO* this [ebp-4]    = {str = 0x0041409800000005}
>>>> ->= (cast(char[])this.str)
>>>> null
>>>> ->
>>>>
> Well, I got the latest 0.0.4.1 or at least I thought I did. It's still
> didn't show the content of the str
> only the address of the string.
> 
> vtp