Tango 0.96 beta2 released

[Sean Kelly]

Frits van Bommel wrote:
> Sean Kelly wrote:
> 
>  > That said, if someone wants to
>> pass on the relevant setjmp headers for a 64-bit glibc then I'll see 
>> about expanding support.
> 
> You mean the ones attached? Or do you need any others?

That should do it.  Though if there are any related comments on what 
registers are stored in __jmp_buf, that would come in handy.  The ones I 
have for Linux contain this in bits/setjmp.h:

#if defined __USE_MISC || defined _ASM
# define JB_BX	0
# define JB_SI	1
# define JB_DI	2
# define JB_BP	3
# define JB_SP	4
# define JB_PC	5
# define JB_SIZE 24
#endif

Your headers don't contain that however, so I'm not entirely sure how to 
slice & dice jmp_buf to inject the proper information.  I'll google a 
bit and try to find out as well.

>  > With this in mind, I don't suppose GDC yet
>> supports inline ASM for the new 64-bit registers, etc?
> 
> Not using the regular DMD-style with Intel syntax, IIRC. But the 
> "extended asm" (using at&t syntax in strings) supports them, I think. 
> Actually, if it's anything like regular GCC then it's almost literally 
> dumped into the input sent to gas (the gnu assembler).

Oh, I didn't know GDC supported this the at&t string syntax.  Interesting.


Sean