I have a suggestion.

[Brian Byrne]

renoX wrote:
> Brian Byrne a écrit :
>> More seriously, I think a better keyword would be rforeach, 
>> revforeach, or something similarly parallel. Something about reading 
>> underscores in keywords (*cough* C++) makes me cringe at the sight.
>>
>> Brian Byrne
> 
> While_a_shorter_keyword_could_be_better_whats_wrong_with_underscores?
> 
> BasicallyThereAreTwoChoiceToLinkSeveralWordsTogetherEitherUnderscoreOrUsingCase. 
> 
> 
> Guess which one is easier one the eye with the two above sentence?
> 
> I *really* don't understand those who prefer CamelCase, it's harder to 
> read, it doesn't work well with shortcuts such as IBM, etc, the only 
> good point of CamelCase is that it is a little more compact, bah.
> 
> renoX

I wasn't implying camel case would be better, rather I believe that 
would also be the wrong way to go. As you probably know, the C++ casts 
are big, long, and ugly for the sake of being big, long, and ugly (to 
discourage their use). I don't think that's so much the aim for 
foreach_reverse. It would just be nicer to shorten it, is all.

Brian Byrne