preparing for const, final, and invariant

Manuel König ManuelK89 at gmx.net
Sun May 20 13:21:18 PDT 2007


I second this.

Doing it this way 'in' also keeps its expressive character of saying 
"Hey, I am only the input and not that bunch of scope const final!", 
which especially makes sense when compared to 'out' in terms of data 
flow. And dismissing all of 'scope const final' just requires you to 
declare your params as 'in', which will rarely be the case.



More information about the Digitalmars-d-announce mailing list