preparing for const, final, and invariant
Walter Bright
newshound1 at digitalmars.com
Sun May 20 20:13:04 PDT 2007
Bill Baxter wrote:
> I just wouldn't like to see 'in' take on a meaning other than "this
> parameter is being passed _in_ and you shouldn't expect to be able to
> get any information _out_ using it"
I also think that would be a disastrously confusing change from what
people having been currently using 'in' for. It'd be like wearing those
funny glasses that turn the world upside down.
More information about the Digitalmars-d-announce
mailing list