preparing for const, final, and invariant

Walter Bright newshound1 at digitalmars.com
Sun May 20 20:13:04 PDT 2007


Bill Baxter wrote:
> I just wouldn't like to see 'in' take on a meaning other than "this 
> parameter is being passed _in_ and you shouldn't expect to be able to 
> get any information _out_ using it"

I also think that would be a disastrously confusing change from what 
people having been currently using 'in' for. It'd be like wearing those 
funny glasses that turn the world upside down.



More information about the Digitalmars-d-announce mailing list