DMD 1.022 and 2.005 releases

[BCS]

Bruce Adams wrote:

> 
> I was going to post a similar question. I do most of my development via gcc. I'm only using DMD on windows rather than gdc because its more reliable (relative to the current state of gdc on cygwin). I have a 
> lot of current C++ code working under gcc which is one thing holding me back from adopting D wholesale. A way of supporting gcc style name mangling as opposed to M$ would be very useful. 
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Bruce.

I would not be a bit surprised if DMD linux does uses GCC naming right now.