DMD 1.022 and 2.005 releases

[Walter Bright]

Bruce Adams wrote:
> I was going to post a similar question. I do most of my development
> via gcc. I'm only using DMD on windows rather than gdc because its
> more reliable (relative to the current state of gdc on cygwin). I
> have a lot of current C++ code working under gcc which is one thing
> holding me back from adopting D wholesale. A way of supporting gcc
> style name mangling as opposed to M$ would be very useful.

Supporting gcc name mangling isn't enough, as dmd on Windows doesn't 
generate ELF and is incompatible with gcc on many levels.

A more practical approach is to recompile your C++ source using DMC++.