DMD 1.022 and 2.005 releases

Walter Bright newshound1 at digitalmars.com
Mon Oct 8 15:10:52 PDT 2007


Bruce Adams wrote:
> Walter Bright Wrote:
>> A more practical approach is to recompile your C++ source using
>> DMC++.
> 
> I doubt it is that practical. Though perhaps worth a try. gcc its
> well integrated with my build system and I keep my code portable
> between windows and linux. It sounds like I'm out of luck there :(. 
> It was hard enough to persuade myself to try dmd when gdc didn't work
> for me. I know gcc's interface backwards. Jumping to another vendor
> (even you :-) is just a little step too far for me. Not to mention
> having to swap gdb for ddbg or whatever it is. I might try porting
> something simple as an exercise in improving the portability of some
> code just to see what happens. As Captain Oates said, I may be some
> time...
> 
> Bruce.

When gdc folds this in, then gdc/g++ should also work. I don't know what 
other issues there are with gdc.



More information about the Digitalmars-d-announce mailing list