DMD 1.029 and 2.013 releases
Sean Kelly
sean at invisibleduck.org
Thu Apr 24 10:23:59 PDT 2008
== Quote from Walter Bright (newshound1 at digitalmars.com)'s article
> Sean Kelly wrote:
> > TLS huh? Nice! So what will replace the volatile statement? As it is,
> > that was the only safe way to perform lock-free operations in D.
> It wasn't safe anyway, because it wasn't implemented. For now, just use
> synchronized instead.
Um, I thought that the volatile statement effectively turned off optimization
in the function containing the volatile block? This wasn't ideal, but it should
have done the trick.
Sean
More information about the Digitalmars-d-announce
mailing list