MiniD 2 - Tentative Release Candidate 1

[davidl]

在 Sat, 13 Dec 2008 23:05:03 +0800，Jarrett Billingsley <jarrett.billingsley at gmail.com> 写道:

> On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 11:45 PM, Jarrett Billingsley
> <jarrett.billingsley at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> I think if MiniD is able to do the syntax I proposed, I wouldn't have those bunch
>>> questions about foreach on a coroutine function.
>>> And People won't expect do foreach on a coroutine in most cases if that syntax comes
>>> true. Because for most people, a coroutine opApply is more intuitive than a coroutine
>>> with an opApply method available.
>>
>> I've considered making coroutines a basic iterable type, in which case
>> their opApply would disappear.  (it would also make the "dummy" first
>> index disappear.)
>
> And they are now :)
> 

Cool, I've learned Scala a bit that I miss several things in scala. 
1.Case class
2.threading

I think those two important features should be considered.

With those two I think it's more sophicated to bind with some GUI interface.

And there , a more active GUI based development could be possible.