Size of 2.009 vs 2.010 zipfile releases, what got trimmed?

[Neal Alexander]

David L. Davis wrote:
> Walter Bright Wrote:
> 
>> bug fixing
>>
>> http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html
>> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.026.zip
>>
>> http://www.digitalmars.com/d/changelog.html
>> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.2.010.zip
> 
> Walter, I noticed that size of D v2.009's zip was 334Kb larger than the current D v2.010's zip...I'm curious as to what got trimmed? 
> 
> David

IIRC the size of binaries dmd produces went up for no apparent reason 
between 2.07 or 2.08 -> 2.09 (on win32 at least).