Size of 2.009 vs 2.010 zipfile releases, what got trimmed?

[David L. Davis]

Neal Alexander Wrote:

> David L. Davis wrote:
> > Walter Bright Wrote:
> > 
> >> bug fixing
> >>
> >> http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html
> >> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.026.zip
> >>
> >> http://www.digitalmars.com/d/changelog.html
> >> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.2.010.zip
> > 
> > Walter, I noticed that size of D v2.009's zip was 334Kb larger than the current D v2.010's zip...I'm curious as to what got trimmed? 
> > 
> > David
> 
> IIRC the size of binaries dmd produces went up for no apparent reason 
> between 2.07 or 2.08 -> 2.09 (on win32 at least).

Neal,
  
    Yep, after downloading the D v2.008 zipfile and looking at the sizes again I can see what you mean. Thanks for the reply.

David