Size of 2.009 vs 2.010 zipfile releases, what got trimmed?

Walter Bright newshound1 at digitalmars.com
Tue Jan 22 14:56:31 PST 2008


Sean Kelly wrote:
> Historically, this has been from additions to the TypeInfo objects.  Was
> there an increase in D 1.0 executable sizes as well?

It helps to use the right switches when compiling <g>.


More information about the Digitalmars-d-announce mailing list