Reorg of D site
Jason House
jason.james.house at gmail.com
Wed Jan 23 12:18:31 PST 2008
Unknown W. Brackets Wrote:
> So, you're splitting potential page rank (something you want to
> maximize) in pieces by using that sort of redirect. If at all possible,
> I strongly suggest using a 301 redirect (which is a "permanent" redirect
> and tells Google to give the page rank to the resultant page.)
Will this also make browsers update the URL in the location bar? I don't like how (currently) typing in a url without /2.0/ or /1.0/ does not end up showing which page you ended up at
>
> If you want, I can provide further documentation on this phenomenon from
> google.com.
>
> That said, I'm glad to see this reorganization, and I'm sure it will
> help people searching the site.
>
> -[Unknown]
>
>
> Walter Bright wrote:
> > As some of you may have noticed, the D 2.0 stuff has all moved into
> > digitalmars.com/d/2.0, instead of digitalmars.com/d. The original files
> > have been replaced with redirects (phew, that was a lot of tedious work).
> >
> > The benefit of this is that the searches are now targeted instead of
> > picking up the whole digitalmars site. (It took about 24 hours for
> > google to reindex the site.)
More information about the Digitalmars-d-announce
mailing list