Reddit: SafeD - The Safe Subset of D

[renoX]

Knud Soerensen a écrit :
> Walter Bright wrote:
>> Clay Smith wrote:
>>> Is SafeD just a label for the programmer selectively using D features?
>> Yes, but it would also be enforced by a compiler switch.
> 
> Hi Walter
> Would it be better to implement a general framework for defining
> code constraints ??
> 
> See Scott Meyers talk on Generalizing Const
> http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4728145737208991310

I must admit that the presentation went way over my head, but I wanted 
to add that those 'code constraints' reminds me of 'capabilities' which 
are an interesting way to provide granular security.

renoX